lots has gone since my last entry.
one of my 'projects' was to build and install a pellet stabilizer/air scrubber for my RWS 52.
it was quite an operation but i got it done.
it altered the appearance and stock of the 52 dramatically but...it was the only way i had to accomplish what i did with what i had.
now that i have it completed, I've set out to find which pellet it likes best so I've ordered some JSB pellets. i had really, really, good luck with them in my other air rifles.
Monday, May 2, 2011
Friday, March 18, 2011
i finally broke
down and purchased an AR.
it's on the M4 platform and i purchased the complete M4 in .22 long rifle with 5.56/.223 'uppers' to go along with it so I'd have a center fire AR as well. my preference for the 22 long rifle may seem odd, but in view of the costs of rimfire vs center fire ammo, i get more shooting from the rimfire. and, here in california, we have to have a bullet button on any semi-automatic , center fire, rifles with a detachable magazine, rimfire semi-automatic rifles are not required to have a bullet button.
I've become somewhat enamored with the AR platform over a period of time.
going back to my youth, i enlisted in the United States Army at the ripe old age of 18, right after graduating from high school.
at that time, the early 60's, the standard issue battle rifle was the M1 Garand, which i qualified with and trained with. it's in the venerable 30-06 caliber. later down the road during my tenure, the M14 rifle and M-60 machine gun was issued.
i was never exposed to the M16 as a soldier.
i have friends and relatives that DID use the M16 in Vietnam and were highly dis-satisfied with its performance to the point they would "pick up" any other rifle, including AK47's just to be assured it would not fail on them at a critical time.
two of my friends tell of being in ambushes and having the M16 jam after the first round was fired from it. not exactly what a soldier is looking for...an unreliable weapon in combat.
I've read much of the early history of the M16 and it's replete with failures and misfortune. in one incident, on Okinawa, a marine captain in charge of marksmanship training of marines, was asked to look at the bullets fired from the M16 at 500 yards...they failed to penetrate the target completely! they were actually lodged in the target! the performance of the M16 at that time was so bad that a marine commander told his subordinates to shut up and accept it...yet it was to be heralded as the answer to the problems of the all time greatest infantry rifles...NOT! it's hard to believe that the military accepted such a flawed weapon but they, for some reason(s) did.
to this day...there are complaints from the "on the line" war fighters that the M16 failed to "take out the bad guy"...the military just will not accept the fact that the 5.56 cartridge is NOT adequate as a combat cartridge! it's that simple.
it also turns out that the bullets themselves, were culprit in the poor performance of the 5.56/.223, M16. they were too light. now the military bullets are in the 70 grain plus weight range NOT the original 55 grain solid, boat-tail, FMJ. an approximate 50% gain in weight
that being said...i chose the M4 platform as it is probably the most versatile semi-automatic, platform in the shooting world today.
if you have the A2 platform it's of the 'flattop' variety that has the Picatinny rail. that feature enables the installation of various optics. that in turn, can change the persona of the M4 from a fire-breathing dragon to a mild mannered plinker in a matter of a few moments.
i chose the M4 carbine platform for many reasons, but the main being the length and weight. i chose to change to the A2 buttstock and i have no bi-pod, forward mounted pistol grip, etc. i view those features more like an "operator", or those who fancy themselves as being "operators", would select for "tactical" or CQB conditions; basically, wannabe "Gunfighters". i do not have that need. i choose to employ a sandbagged rest or a mechanical rest and when in the field, it's very easy to locate or construct a good, solid, shooting rest. in fact i carry a home made canvas bag specifically for that purpose. i simply fill it when the need arises and empty it when I'm ready to leave; it's very hard to beat a sandbag rest...even with a bi-pod.
i choose to use the standard A2 sight system but i do have multiple optics to select from should i see the need/want for optics. i seldom ever shoot more than 100 yards so the need for telescopic sighting devices is limited for me, by choice, not necessity. if I'm going to shoot at aspirins from 75 yards, then telescopic optics is a must, otherwise, the 'irons' will normally suffice. these all may be installed and calibrated in mere moments when, and if, the need arises. in fact, if one leaves the sighting devices in the rings they were installed and sighted in with, they're almost always right on if placed back in the same slots they were originally adjusted in on the Picatinny rail.
it's on the M4 platform and i purchased the complete M4 in .22 long rifle with 5.56/.223 'uppers' to go along with it so I'd have a center fire AR as well. my preference for the 22 long rifle may seem odd, but in view of the costs of rimfire vs center fire ammo, i get more shooting from the rimfire. and, here in california, we have to have a bullet button on any semi-automatic , center fire, rifles with a detachable magazine, rimfire semi-automatic rifles are not required to have a bullet button.
I've become somewhat enamored with the AR platform over a period of time.
going back to my youth, i enlisted in the United States Army at the ripe old age of 18, right after graduating from high school.
at that time, the early 60's, the standard issue battle rifle was the M1 Garand, which i qualified with and trained with. it's in the venerable 30-06 caliber. later down the road during my tenure, the M14 rifle and M-60 machine gun was issued.
i was never exposed to the M16 as a soldier.
i have friends and relatives that DID use the M16 in Vietnam and were highly dis-satisfied with its performance to the point they would "pick up" any other rifle, including AK47's just to be assured it would not fail on them at a critical time.
two of my friends tell of being in ambushes and having the M16 jam after the first round was fired from it. not exactly what a soldier is looking for...an unreliable weapon in combat.
I've read much of the early history of the M16 and it's replete with failures and misfortune. in one incident, on Okinawa, a marine captain in charge of marksmanship training of marines, was asked to look at the bullets fired from the M16 at 500 yards...they failed to penetrate the target completely! they were actually lodged in the target! the performance of the M16 at that time was so bad that a marine commander told his subordinates to shut up and accept it...yet it was to be heralded as the answer to the problems of the all time greatest infantry rifles...NOT! it's hard to believe that the military accepted such a flawed weapon but they, for some reason(s) did.
to this day...there are complaints from the "on the line" war fighters that the M16 failed to "take out the bad guy"...the military just will not accept the fact that the 5.56 cartridge is NOT adequate as a combat cartridge! it's that simple.
it also turns out that the bullets themselves, were culprit in the poor performance of the 5.56/.223, M16. they were too light. now the military bullets are in the 70 grain plus weight range NOT the original 55 grain solid, boat-tail, FMJ. an approximate 50% gain in weight
that being said...i chose the M4 platform as it is probably the most versatile semi-automatic, platform in the shooting world today.
if you have the A2 platform it's of the 'flattop' variety that has the Picatinny rail. that feature enables the installation of various optics. that in turn, can change the persona of the M4 from a fire-breathing dragon to a mild mannered plinker in a matter of a few moments.
i chose the M4 carbine platform for many reasons, but the main being the length and weight. i chose to change to the A2 buttstock and i have no bi-pod, forward mounted pistol grip, etc. i view those features more like an "operator", or those who fancy themselves as being "operators", would select for "tactical" or CQB conditions; basically, wannabe "Gunfighters". i do not have that need. i choose to employ a sandbagged rest or a mechanical rest and when in the field, it's very easy to locate or construct a good, solid, shooting rest. in fact i carry a home made canvas bag specifically for that purpose. i simply fill it when the need arises and empty it when I'm ready to leave; it's very hard to beat a sandbag rest...even with a bi-pod.
i choose to use the standard A2 sight system but i do have multiple optics to select from should i see the need/want for optics. i seldom ever shoot more than 100 yards so the need for telescopic sighting devices is limited for me, by choice, not necessity. if I'm going to shoot at aspirins from 75 yards, then telescopic optics is a must, otherwise, the 'irons' will normally suffice. these all may be installed and calibrated in mere moments when, and if, the need arises. in fact, if one leaves the sighting devices in the rings they were installed and sighted in with, they're almost always right on if placed back in the same slots they were originally adjusted in on the Picatinny rail.
Friday, March 4, 2011
well i took
the plunge and got an AR; it's in the M4 platform.
i elected to go with a 22lr that has the option to convert to centerfire uppers and i purchased the centerfire upper to go with it.
my first time out with it i have had "mixed" results.
it is proving to be very accurate, if not highly accurate.
the "downside" is that it had numerous FTE (Failure To Eject) problems.
i will clean it before my next outing and see if the problem is overcome.
but, it may be in the ammo. however...the ammo is made specifically for semi auto rifles. and, if this ammo proves to be the problem, i can still use it in my BA 22's...no big deal.
no matter...i will work out the problem; .22 rimfires are notorious about such problems.
in the short time I've had it, I've come to see what the attraction to them is.
they're light in hand, easy to aim, easy to control and appear to be very, very accurate even with the A2 carry handle and A2 front sight that comes standard on them. i do have a good red/green dot optic i can mount if necessary, too.
for the night duty, i simply attached my hi-intensity tactical flashlite to the barrel. now i have a perfect sight picture in total dark (once the lite is switched "on", of course...) it now has day and nite capability.
many folks would argue the validity of the usage of a .22 rimfire as a HD weapon...i won't...i have every bit of faith in it as an adequate HD round. it travels at 1200 fps, has over 100 ft lbs of KE from a 40 grain bullet at the muzzle and the distances we're talking about in a SD scenario are usually 25 ft and less. at a semi-automatic rate of fire, a magazine of 10 could be put on target in less than 5 seconds with ease. what more can a person ask?
i elected to go with a 22lr that has the option to convert to centerfire uppers and i purchased the centerfire upper to go with it.
my first time out with it i have had "mixed" results.
it is proving to be very accurate, if not highly accurate.
the "downside" is that it had numerous FTE (Failure To Eject) problems.
i will clean it before my next outing and see if the problem is overcome.
but, it may be in the ammo. however...the ammo is made specifically for semi auto rifles. and, if this ammo proves to be the problem, i can still use it in my BA 22's...no big deal.
no matter...i will work out the problem; .22 rimfires are notorious about such problems.
in the short time I've had it, I've come to see what the attraction to them is.
they're light in hand, easy to aim, easy to control and appear to be very, very accurate even with the A2 carry handle and A2 front sight that comes standard on them. i do have a good red/green dot optic i can mount if necessary, too.
for the night duty, i simply attached my hi-intensity tactical flashlite to the barrel. now i have a perfect sight picture in total dark (once the lite is switched "on", of course...) it now has day and nite capability.
many folks would argue the validity of the usage of a .22 rimfire as a HD weapon...i won't...i have every bit of faith in it as an adequate HD round. it travels at 1200 fps, has over 100 ft lbs of KE from a 40 grain bullet at the muzzle and the distances we're talking about in a SD scenario are usually 25 ft and less. at a semi-automatic rate of fire, a magazine of 10 could be put on target in less than 5 seconds with ease. what more can a person ask?
Thursday, February 10, 2011
i never realized
what a difference the correct pellet would mean.
I've a .20 caliber Beeman RX-1 i purchased brand new numerous years ago that I've shot on and off over the years with mixed results; some good...some NOT so good.
i purchased some bulk pellets from a commonly known, popular, American airgun manufacturing company that i had some very good results with at closer ranges (within 25 yards) so i purchased two more tins of them without hesitation.
i use a BSA, airgun, 2-7x32 scope on this particular rifle that is secured to the rifle with a good secure airgun rated scope mount so i know that it's not the scope and the mounts. the rifle also has the correct pressure setting in the gas piston and the tension is set correctly for the barrel/receiver tension.
recently, i spotted a game animal at a lasered range of 63 yards and fired at it only to see the pellet strike be off by nearly a foot at the measured 63 yards. i was dumbfounded.
back to the range with the pellets...
i was shooting at a measured 50 yards at my back yard range and it's backstop. i have three, 4", steel discs that i use for targets on the back stop so i know for sure when i get a good, solid, 'hit'...and, they will show a fresh "splash" of the pellet strike.
i was horrified to find that i was able to hit the disc only two out of ten shots from a shooting rest!
i decided to check pellet size to see if there was a problem there. i have a set of pellet sizing dies that i routinely use and i decided to use one to check if the pellets were of sufficent diameter to fit the chamber/bore correctly.
i was dismayed to find that every pellet, LITERALLY, fell thru the die with no resistance whatsoever utilizing the smallest of the dies.
i searched my stash of pellets and came up with a tin of Beeman Crow-Magnums in .20 caliber and decided to try them after sizing them.
what a difference that made! every shot was in it's mark after that!
now, I'm not much of a .177 fan unless it's in the magnum rifles and I'm not gonna run out and buy bigger caliber air rifles (i have .22 and .25 caliber PCP rifles as it is) but...i think that .20 caliber is just about the smallest bore air rifle i care to get involved with in a more than 'casual' use scenario with so that's why i pursue the .20 gas piston. (i think i would convert it to a .22 if i could find a good barrel for a decent cost, though)
this Beeman RX-1 is such a solid, well made,dependable, accurate rifle, i could never part with it; it wreaks of quality. it's made in Germany for Beeman by FWB or HW, i don't recall which at the moment.
it's NOT an easy rifle to shoot. it's difficult to cock (after all, it is a magnum rifle)heavy in hand, and has heavy, noticeable, recoil...but once you learn to "live with it", it's not that bad at all.
but, i do prefer form and function over appearance for the biggest part and the Beeman has all of it. that's why a person will pay a premium price for the Beeman line of air rifles.
anyway...i now have to go a bit farther with researching which pellet to shoot from this fine rifle to maximize it's potential.
I've a .20 caliber Beeman RX-1 i purchased brand new numerous years ago that I've shot on and off over the years with mixed results; some good...some NOT so good.
i purchased some bulk pellets from a commonly known, popular, American airgun manufacturing company that i had some very good results with at closer ranges (within 25 yards) so i purchased two more tins of them without hesitation.
i use a BSA, airgun, 2-7x32 scope on this particular rifle that is secured to the rifle with a good secure airgun rated scope mount so i know that it's not the scope and the mounts. the rifle also has the correct pressure setting in the gas piston and the tension is set correctly for the barrel/receiver tension.
recently, i spotted a game animal at a lasered range of 63 yards and fired at it only to see the pellet strike be off by nearly a foot at the measured 63 yards. i was dumbfounded.
back to the range with the pellets...
i was shooting at a measured 50 yards at my back yard range and it's backstop. i have three, 4", steel discs that i use for targets on the back stop so i know for sure when i get a good, solid, 'hit'...and, they will show a fresh "splash" of the pellet strike.
i was horrified to find that i was able to hit the disc only two out of ten shots from a shooting rest!
i decided to check pellet size to see if there was a problem there. i have a set of pellet sizing dies that i routinely use and i decided to use one to check if the pellets were of sufficent diameter to fit the chamber/bore correctly.
i was dismayed to find that every pellet, LITERALLY, fell thru the die with no resistance whatsoever utilizing the smallest of the dies.
i searched my stash of pellets and came up with a tin of Beeman Crow-Magnums in .20 caliber and decided to try them after sizing them.
what a difference that made! every shot was in it's mark after that!
now, I'm not much of a .177 fan unless it's in the magnum rifles and I'm not gonna run out and buy bigger caliber air rifles (i have .22 and .25 caliber PCP rifles as it is) but...i think that .20 caliber is just about the smallest bore air rifle i care to get involved with in a more than 'casual' use scenario with so that's why i pursue the .20 gas piston. (i think i would convert it to a .22 if i could find a good barrel for a decent cost, though)
this Beeman RX-1 is such a solid, well made,dependable, accurate rifle, i could never part with it; it wreaks of quality. it's made in Germany for Beeman by FWB or HW, i don't recall which at the moment.
it's NOT an easy rifle to shoot. it's difficult to cock (after all, it is a magnum rifle)heavy in hand, and has heavy, noticeable, recoil...but once you learn to "live with it", it's not that bad at all.
but, i do prefer form and function over appearance for the biggest part and the Beeman has all of it. that's why a person will pay a premium price for the Beeman line of air rifles.
anyway...i now have to go a bit farther with researching which pellet to shoot from this fine rifle to maximize it's potential.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)